Legal Opinion
Davies Precision MacHining, Inc. v. Defense Logistics Agency
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 25, 1993No. Civ. A. 93-3242PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
KATZ, District Judge.
Defendants Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) and the General Service Administration (GSA) move this court to dismiss the complaint or in the alternative to transfer this ease to a proper venue pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a). For the following reasons, I will dismiss the complaint as the Eastern District of Pennsylvania is improper venue for this action.
I. BACKGROUND,
This case stems from the Plaintiffs’ debarment from doing business with the government based upon Plaintiffs’ performance of contracts issued by the Defense Construction Supply Center. In their…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Stafford v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Seven Oaks, Inc. v. Federal Housing AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948
- Superior Oil Co. v. AndrusCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Reuben H. Donnelley Corp. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
3Cited by5 opinions
- Caremark Therapeutic Services v. LeavittDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Schwarz v. Internal Revenue ServiceDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1998
- Navajo Health Foundation-Sage Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. BurwellDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2015
- ADAMS, NASH & HASKELL, INC. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
- MYSLIMI v. BIDENDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021