Legal Opinion

Miller v. Mattern

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1934PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLawrence, J.

Plaintiff recovered verdict of $5,000. No witnesses were sworn by defendant. The only question for the jury to determine was the amount of their verdict. At the close of the case, motion to set aside verdict as excessive was denied. This motion is now made on the added ground that the jury improperly applied the rule of damages, as stated by the court, and that the verdict was the result of an improper consideration of attorneys’ fees to the prejudice of defendants. Affidavits are submitted by ten of the twelve jurors, and an additional affidavit as to a conversation with another juryman.

It…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dalrymple v. . WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. Hodgkins v. . MeadNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  3. Ex parte CaykendollNew York Supreme Court · 1826
  4. Webber v. ReynoldsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  5. Zunino v. Parodi Cigar Co.New York Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Miller v. MatternAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API