Legal Opinion

Oklahoma National Bank v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided November 15, 1951No. Civ. A. No. 4717PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHANDLER, District Judge.

This ease arises under the Reconstruction Finance Corporation Act, 47 Stat. 5, as amended, 15 U.S.C.A. § 601 et seq.

The issue is whether interpretation of the Blanket Participation Agreement entered into between the Oklahoma National Bank, hereinafter called the bank, and the Reconstruction Finance Corporation, hereinafter called the RFC, requires knowledge on the part of a bank that any part of the funds loaned by it pursuant to the agreement is used, directly or indirectly, to repay prior indebtedness to the bank.

The Blanket Participation Agreement authorized the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brewer v. RustSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. Amicable Life Ins. Co. v. O'ReillyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  3. Maryland Casualty Co. v. ScharlackDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1939

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Central National Bank v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1955
  2. American Trust Co. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
  3. Opinion No. 72-292 (1973) Ag, Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API