Legal Opinion

Smith v. United States of America (INMATE 3)

District Court, M.D. Alabama

Decided June 10, 2024No. 2:21-cv-00271Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION ATRAVIUS SMITH, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2:21-cv-271-MHT-SMD ) (WO) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Respondent. ) RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE Atravius Smith is before the court on a motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. (Doc. 1.)1 For the reasons discussed below, the Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that the § 2255 motion be DENIED without an evidentiary hearing and that this action be DISMISSED with prejudice. I. BACKGROUND On May 22, 2018, a jury…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Kenneth Henley v. Willie E. Johnson, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
  5. Maurice Mayo v. Robert J. Henderson, Superintendent, Robert Abrams, Attorney General of the State of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API