Legal Opinion

Great Southland Limited v. Landash Corporation

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided January 28, 2022No. 2:17-cv-00719Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION GREAT SOUTHLAND LIMITED, Plaintiff, Case No.: 2:17-cv-719 vs. Judge Sarah D. Morrison LANDASH CORPORATION, et al., Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson Defendants. OPINION & ORDER Several motions in limine bring this matter to the Court’s attention. Each is decided as noted below. I. STANDARD OF REVIEW A motion in limine is a pre-trial mechanism by which the Court can give the parties advance notice of the evidence upon which they may or may not rely to prove their theories of the case at trial. Although the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Luce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Doris Berry, Personal Representative of the Estate of Lee F. Berry, Jr., Deceased v. City of DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API