Legal Opinion
Philadelphia Warehouse Co. v. Seeman
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided May 11, 1925No. 220PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MANTON, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff in error is a Pennsylvania corporation doing a warehouse business in that state, and the defendants in error are copartners engaged in the wholesale grocery business in Now York state. The action is brought to recover $8,000 for the conversion of eases of salmon, title to which was in the plaintiff in error under a negotiable railroad bill of lading indorsed to it by the pledgor, Cocoaro & Go., a partnership, in New York City, on November 18, 1919. ■ They 'were pledged as security for an advance .of credit in the sum of $5,900 to be made by the plaintiff in…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Central Bank of Washington v. HumeSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Orvis v. . CurtissNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Coghlan v. South Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Tilden v. BlairSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Meaker v. . FieroNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Mid-West Chevrolet Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
- Oil City Motor Co. v. CIT CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
- Equitable Trust Co. v. A. C. White Lumber Co.District Court, D. Idaho · 1930
- United Light & Power Co. v. Grand Rapids Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1936
- Guaranty Trust Co. of New York v. Grand Rapids, G. H. & M. Ry. Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.