Astra Pictures, Inc. v. Schapiro
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Memobandum Per Curiam.
Appellant is entitled to plead the defense of usury. While the corporate defendant may not plead usury, the appellant’s intestate, who signed the note as comaker, may avail himself of that defense.
*20The order should be modified to the extent of granting defendant-appellant’s motion to amend the answer to include the defense of usury, and, as modified, affirmed, without costs. Service of amended answer, on or before June 12th, to be without prejudice to the present position of the cause upon the calendar.
Shientag, McLaughlin and Hecht, JJ., concur.
Ordered accordingly.
2Cited by7 opinions
- Meadow Brook National Bank v. RecileDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1969
- Rosen v. Columbia Savings & Loan Ass'nNew York Supreme Court · 1961
- Simon v. LandauNew York Supreme Court · 1960
- Wiltsek v. Anglo-American Properties, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1967
- In re the Estate of WaldmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.