Legal Opinion
Thrasher v. United States Liability Insurance
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 18, 1965PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.
This motion by the defendant United States Liability Insurance Company for an order consolidating the two actions herein cannot be disposed of on the merits. It must be and is denied; but such determination is without prejudice to renewal upon due notice of motion.
CPLR. 2214 (subd. [b]) requires service of a notice of a motion and the supporting affidavits at least, 8 days before the return date, and CPLR 2103 (subd. [¡b], par. 2) requires that 3 additional days be added to this prescribed period where the service is by mail. Here the moving papers appear to have been so served, as evidenced…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re GlasserNew York Supreme Court · 1942
- Silverman v. SilvermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
- Palmer v. Rotary Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
- Schoenberg v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1954
3Cited by7 opinions
- Coonradt v. WalcoNew York Supreme Court · 1967
- Edgar v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
- In re the Arbitration between Graffagnino & Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1965
- Plaza 400 Owners Corp. v. ResnicoffCivil Court of the City of New York · 1996
- Goldman v. McCordCivil Court of the City of New York · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.