Legal Opinion
Tennessee Valley Authority v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided December 26, 2001No. 01-249CPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRUGGINK, Judge.
Pending is defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. Also pending is plaintiffs motion for stay of motions for partial summary judgment recently filed by defendant pending resolution of the motion to dismiss. Oral argument was heard on December 19, 2001. For the reasons set out below the motion to dismiss is denied and plaintiffs motion for a stay is granted, albeit for different reasons.
BACKGROUND
Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) is an independent government corporation created by and existing pursuant to 16 U.S.C. §§ 831-831ee (1994 & Supp. V 1999). It is…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Freytag v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- North Carolina Ex Rel. Cooper v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
- Council for Tribal Employment Rights v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Coast-To-Coast Financial Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- North Carolina Ex Rel. Cooper v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008