Legal Opinion
Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. v. Accelight Technologies, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided April 23, 2025No. 4:24-cv-09041Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 APPLIED OPTOELECTRONICS, INC., Case No. 24-cv-09041-HSG 8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT ACCELIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.'S 9 v. MOTION TO DISMISS 10 ACCELIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 24 11 Defendant. 12 13 Pending before the Court is Defendant Accelight Technologies, Inc.’s (“Defendant”) 14 motion to dismiss Plaintiff Applied Optoelectronics, Inc.’s (“Plaintiff’) first amended complaint 15 (“FAC”). Dkt. No. 24 (“Mot.”). The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without 16 oral argument and takes…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Sprewell v. Golden State WarriorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Manzarek v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.