Horowitz v. Horowitz
New York Family Court
1Opinion of the CourtPanken, J.
The parties before the court were lawfully married. This proceeding is brought on behalf of the issue, a minor, child of said marriage. No prayer or demand is made by the wife of the respondent for her support or maintenance. She seeks support for her child only.
Section 101 of the Domestic Relations Court Act of the City of New York (L. 1933, ch. 482) provides that a father is chargeable with the support of his offspring and “ if possessed of sufficient means or able to earn such means, may be required to pay for their support a fair and reasonable sum according to his means ”, as the court…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Helman v. HelmanNew York Family Court · 1947
- Mallina v. MallinaNew York Family Court · 1938
- Szilagyi v. SzilagyiNew York Family Court · 1939
- Walton v. WaltonNew York Family Court · 1942
- Sinno v. SinnoNew York Family Court · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Michelle W. v. Forrest James P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- In re FletcherNew York Family Court · 1955
- Powell v. PowellNew York City Family Court · 1970