Salt River Project v. Industrial Commission
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VOSS, Presiding Judge.
This is a special action review of an Arizona Industrial Commission (“commission”) award denying apportionment under the second injury fund statute. See Ariz. Rev.Stat.Ann. (“A.R.S.”) § 23-1065(0 (Supp.1991). We address one issue: whether a brain tumor (meningioma) is a “[c]erebral vascular accident,” one of the listed impairments under subsection 23-1065(C). See A.R.S. § 23-1065(C)(3)(k). The Administrative Law Judge (“A.L.J.”) concluded that this phrase refers to a stroke. We agree and accordingly affirm the award denying apportionment for a meningioma.
In August…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Smith v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1976
- Window Rock School District 8 v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
3Cited by6 opinions
- Country Wide Truck Service v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
- Schuff Steel v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZ.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
- Special Fund Division v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
- Special Fund Division v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
- Department of Corrections v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.