Legal Opinion

City of Detroit v. Smith

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided July 27, 1999No. Docket 208869PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHoekstra, P.J.

Defendants in this case were charged with violating a city ordinance prohibiting anyone from interfering with a city worker’s performance of his duty. Specifically, they attempted to prevent a police officer from arresting their relative. We granted leave for plaintiff to appeal a Recorder’s Court order reversing defendants’ district court convictions and granting defendants a new trial. We reverse and remand.

On July 11, 1996, a Detroit police officer, working as a community relations officer, was patrolling a shopping center. According to the officer, he was in a clothing store when Lavada…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. KrumMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  2. State v. ValentineWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. People v. PetersMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. ThomasSupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
  5. People v. EisenbergMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lucinda Darrah v. City of Oak Park, Russell Bragg, a Troy Police OfficerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  2. Rogers v. Detroit Police DepartmentDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2009
  3. Commonwealth v. MontesMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
  4. Williams v. PayneDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API