People v. Justice
Michigan Court of Appeals
1ConcurrenceFitzgerald, P.J.
{concurring). I concur with the majority’s conclusion that consideration of the prior conviction does not offend the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution. However, I disagree with the holdings in People v Richert (After Remand), 216 Mich App 186; _ NW2d _ (1996), and the holding of the majority herein, that such consideration does not run afoul of Const 1963, art 1, § 20. Therefore, I concur only because I am required to do so by Administrative Order No. 1996-4.
The Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution provides, in relevant part, that “[i]n all criminal prosecutions,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Scott v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Nichols v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- People v. JenkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
- Boyd v. W G Wade ShowsMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
- People v. MalloryMichigan Supreme Court · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.