Legal Opinion · Concurrence

People v. Justice

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided July 12, 1996No. Docket 170619Published

1ConcurrenceFitzgerald, P.J.

{concurring). I concur with the majority’s conclusion that consideration of the prior conviction does not offend the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution. However, I disagree with the holdings in People v Richert (After Remand), 216 Mich App 186; _ NW2d _ (1996), and the holding of the majority herein, that such consideration does not run afoul of Const 1963, art 1, § 20. Therefore, I concur only because I am required to do so by Administrative Order No. 1996-4.

The Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution provides, in relevant part, that “[i]n all criminal prosecutions,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Scott v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Nichols v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. People v. JenkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Boyd v. W G Wade ShowsMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  5. People v. MalloryMichigan Supreme Court · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API