Legal Opinion

In Re DM

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 1, 1999PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

727 A.2d 556 (1999)

In the Interest of D.M.

Appeal of D.M.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Re-Submitted June 17, 1998.

Decided April 1, 1999.

L. Roy Zipris, Philadelphia, for D.M.

Catherine Marshall, Mary L. Porto, Philadelphia, for the Com.

Before FLAHERTY, C.J., and ZAPPALA, CAPPY, CASTILLE, NIGRO, NEWMAN and SAYLOR, JJ.

OPINION OF THE COURT

CASTILLE, Justice.

This is an appeal from the Order of the Superior Court affirming the trial court's order adjudicating appellant delinquent. The issue before this Court is whether, pursuant to the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, the Superior…

Also in this document: Dissent · Zappala; Dissent · Nigro.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. United States v. HensleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Commonwealth v. HicksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PerrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Commonwealth v. DowdsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Commonwealth v. FreemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. In the Interest of: J.G., a MinorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API