Legal Opinion

City of Jeannette v. Fraternal Order of Police Jeannette Lodge No. 24

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 18, 1976No. Appeal, No. 158 Misc. DktPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

President Judge Bowman,

This appeal calls upon us to again review an arbitration award issued pursuant to the Act of June 24, 1968, P.L. 237, 43 P.S. §217.1 et seq. (commonly referred to as Act No. Ill), which granted to police officers expanded benefit rights and which appellant, *166City of Jeannette, asserts to be violative of the statutory law on the subject.1

In City of Reading v. Reading F. O. P. No. 9, 15 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 344, 325 A.2d 675 (1974), we said:

The general subject of pensions is a bargain-able issue under Act No. Ill, being one of the enumerated subjects encompassed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Washington Arbitration CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  2. Allegheny County Firefighters v. Allegheny CountyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Cheltenham Township v. Cheltenham Police DepartmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Cheltenham Township v. Cheltenham Township Police DepartmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. City of Reading v. Reading Lodge Fraternal Order of Police No. 9Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API