Legal Opinion
Cheltenham Township v. Cheltenham Police Department
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 15, 1973No. Appeal, No. 5 Tr. DktPublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Wilkinson,
Following unsuccessful collective bargaining, pursuant to the Act of June 24, 1968, P. L. , No. 111 (Act 111), 43 P.S. §217.1, appellant, Cheltenham Townhip, and appellee, Cheltenham Police Department, submitted the issues in dispute to binding arbitration as provided by Section 4 of Act 111, 43 P.S. §217.4. On December 21, 1971, the Board of Arbitration made the award now being challenged in part by appellant. Appellant filed a Petition for Certiorari in the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania under Rule 68-1/2 which was granted on February 9, 1972. The Order granting the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Washington Arbitration CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- Allegheny County Firefighters v. Allegheny CountyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Brookchester, Inc. v. MatthewsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972
3Cited by25 opinions
- Tp. of Moon v. POL. OFFICE. OF TP. OF MOONSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Pennsylvania State Police v. Pennsylvania State Troopers' Ass'nCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Cheltenham Township v. Cheltenham Township Police DepartmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Rankin v. Chester-Upland School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- In re the Arbitration between the Borough of Ambridge & the Police DepartmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.