Legal Opinion

Mathews v. Mathews

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 8, 1920No. 9653PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Action by administrator to recover property alleged to belong to estate of decedent. Judgment for plaintiff. Error to the District Court of the City and County of Denver, Hon. John T. Shumate, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bailey

This cause is here on writ of error to review a judgment of the District Court of the City and County of Denver, wherein it is decreed that plaintiffs in error hold in trust certain real and personal property, which they are directed to turn over to a trustee appointed by the court, for the benefit of the estate of Cornelius M. Mathews, of which estate plaintiff is administrator, with will annexed. The parties are all brothers.

The first cause of action alleges in substance that plaintiff *334is the administrator of the will of his brother, Cornelius, which had been admitted to probate in Ohio,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Denver & Rio Grande Railroad v. SullivanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1895
  2. Tourtelotte v. BrownColorado Court of Appeals · 1894

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kruger v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
  2. Robbins v. NelsenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1921
  3. Simons v. First National Bank of DenverColorado Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. Winslett v. RozanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
  5. Winslett v. RozanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API