Legal Opinion

Reiner v. Dormitory Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 22, 1999PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, (1) the defendants Polera Construction Corporation, Inc., and TDX Construction Corp. separately appeal, as limited by their briefs, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Mastro, J.), dated September 8, 1998, as denied those branches of their separate motions for summary judgment which were to dismiss the causes of action based upon common-law negligence and Labor Law §§ 200 and 241 (6), and (2) the third-party defendant separately appeals from stated portions of the same order which, inter alia, denied that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Trincere v. County of SuffolkNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Smith v. StarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Richichi v. Construction Management Technologies, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  5. Camarda v. Summit HomesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. v. Dormitory Authority-State of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
  2. Tighe v. Raimondo Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API