Legal Opinion

Harris v. Muriel Sportswear, Inc.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided October 22, 1959PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The examination of the plaintiff before trial was conditioned on the defendant corporation appearing here from Miami, Florida, for its examination and producing its books and records. Since defendant was brought into this action involuntarily and was a foreign corporation resident at a great distance from this city, with no officer or employee available here, the granting of the conditional examination was an improvident exercise of discretion. In the circumstances, the examination of the plaintiff should have been granted unconditionally and the examination of the defendant should have been…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Probst v. FrenkelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
  2. E. Richard Meinig Co. v. United States Fastener Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
  3. Kraushaar v. GrossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
  4. Honig v. Edlill Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
  5. Wiesenberg v. KosterNew York Supreme Court · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of WalkerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1961
  2. Albert v. BankenNew York Supreme Court · 1962
  3. In re the Estate of ArnsteinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API