Albert v. Banken
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.
The defendant is a Swedish hanking corporation. It has no officers, directors, agents or employees in this country. This action was commenced by attachment of the defendant’s funds in this city. The complaint alleges two causes of action, one in tort and one in contract on a guaranty. The defendant’s answer consists of a general denial and an affirmative defense that the alleged guaranty was conditional and had never become effective.
Some time ago, the plaintiff sought by way of notice to examine the defendant before trial in New York County, where the action is pending. The defendant moved…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Probst v. FrenkelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
- Fitzgerald v. FitzgeraldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
- Kraushaar v. GrossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
- Sivelli v. New River Coal Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
- Drews v. SpencerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ratner v. RatnerNew York City Family Court · 1973