Legal Opinion

Robb v. Connecticut Board of Veterinary Medicine

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided January 20, 2016No. 3:15-CV-00906 (CSH)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS, PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION, AND PROPOSED IN-TERVENER’S MOTIONS

HAIGHT, Senior District Judge:

Plaintiff Dr. John M. Robb, D.V.M., a doctor of veterinary medicine licensed in the state of Connecticut, brings this action for injunctive relief and damages under the Sherman Antitrust Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, against Defendants, the Connecticut Board of Veterinary Medicine (the “Board”)1 and its five constituent members: B. Kenneth Bernhard, Dr. Theresa Cianciolo, D.V.M., Mary Anne O’Neill, Dr. Timothy Plunkett, D.V.M., and Dr. Alfredo…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jacobson Warehouse Company Inc. v. Lindt & Sprungli (North America) Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2021
  2. John Hilaire v. Cohen, Burns, Hard, & Paul, LLC et al.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2026
  3. Parks v. Alabama Board of Pharmacy (CONSENT)District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2021
  4. Randy W. Norman v. State of Connecticut et al.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API