Legal Opinion

Wall v. Close

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 4, 1942No. 36838PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PONDER, Justice.

The plaintiff, Lorin Wall, a citizen and taxpayer of Livingston Parish, brought suit s'eeking to have Act 111 of 1942, an act creating the Department of Finance and its various functions, declared unconstitutional and to enjoin the expenditure of funds appropriated thereunder and other •funds being used to carry out the provisions of the Act. A rule was issued ordering the defendants, Martin L. Close, Director of Finance, and others, to show cause why a preliminary injunction should not issue against the defendants enjoining them from expending the funds. When the rule was…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hardware Dealers Mutual Fire Insurance v. Glidden Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. State ex rel. Civello v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
  3. Gelfert v. National City Bank of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Duffy v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1896
  5. Moore v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1880

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Sawicki v. K/S STAVANGER PRINCESupreme Court of Louisiana · 2001
  2. Naquin v. Titan Indem. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2001
  3. Hamilton v. La. Health & Human Resources Adm'nLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. Hirt v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1954
  5. Baton Rouge Etc. v. Gen. Truck, Etc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1981

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API