Legal Opinion

National Exchange Bank of Steubenville v. McElfish Clay Manufacturing Co.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1900PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error to Circuit Court, Hancock County. Action by the National Exchange Bank of Steubenville, Ohio, against Francis E. McElfish, Jeremiah C. Swearengen, and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

McWhorter, President:

This is an action of assumpsit brought in the circuit court of Hancock County by the National Exchange Bank of Steuben-ville, Ohio, against Francis E. McElfish and Jeremiah C. Swearengen, partners doing business under the firm name of the McElfish Clay Manufacturing Company, Albert G. Lee, Bobert M. Lee and the said persons composing the said partnership firm under the name of the McElfish Clay Manufacturing Company, partners doing business under the firm name of A. G. Lee & Co., on three notes, all dated at Penrith, West Virginia, each payable sixty days after its date…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Heard v. Dubuque County BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Crosby v. RoubWisconsin Supreme Court · 1863
  3. Robinson v. LairSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
  4. Hance v. MillerIllinois Supreme Court · 1859
  5. Hoffman v. BircherWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1883

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hendrix v. Bauhard Bros.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  2. Smith's Adm'r v. Charlton's Adm'rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1851
  3. Cady v. Bay City Land Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Hutson v. RankinIdaho Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Mollohan v. North Side Cheese CompanyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1959

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API