Legal Opinion

Tyson v. . Tyson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1888PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The action was brought to obtain a construction of the will of plaintiffs' testator for the guidance of plaintiffs in the discharge of their duties.

A jury trial was waived and the court found the facts.

Both sides appealed.

The facts are stated by the Chief Justice as follows:

John Tyson died in February, 1885, leaving a will and therein appointing his son John A. Tyson and his sons-in-law J. F. Gaddy and Atlas D. Dumas his executors, of whom the first named two are the plaintiffs in the action, and the defendants are the heirs at law, devisees and legatees mentioned in the will, with the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hart v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
  2. Little v. . ThorneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  3. State v. . HeavenerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  4. Cozart v. . LyonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
  5. Jordan v. . SigmonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. First Security Trust Co. v. LentzSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  2. Hughes v. HughesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1903
  3. London v. . PelchenanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API