Legal Opinion

Tana Cutcliff v. Nathan Reuter

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided May 4, 2018No. 17-1465PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

GRUENDER, Circuit Judge.

Appellants (the "Creditors") are attempting to collect on judgments against Vertical Group, LLC ("Vertical") and Nathan Reuter by levying assets now belonging to Nathan's wife, Kathleen. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the district court's 2 orders granting summary judgment to Kathleen and to Nathan and denying partial summary judgment to the Creditors.

I

As we have previously explained, the Creditors are a group of victims defrauded by a Ponzi scheme run by Nathan and several associates under the aegis of Vertical. See Cutcliff v. Reuter , 791 F.3d 875 , 878-80…

Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. David J. BECHTOLD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF ROSEMOUNT, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  2. Ronollo v. JacobsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  3. Tana Cutcliff v. Kathleen ReuterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
  4. Fish v. FishMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
  5. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission of Missouri v. MorgansteinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bader Farms, Inc. v. Monsanto CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API