Reynolds v. Ross County Children's Services Agency
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Appellant first argues that the court’s decision finding appellant not suitable to have custody of the children is not supported by a preponderance of the evidence.
The children, now ranging in age from eleven to sixteen years, testified at the hearing. The two youngest children had only vague recollections of their father. The oldest daughter testified that she had been sexually abused by appellant and his friends, that her father was often drunk or her mother often away from home, and that there was not enough food or clothing in the *29house. The second oldest child did not claim any sexual…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Perales v. NinoOhio Supreme Court · 1977
- Baker v. ScottOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- Walker v. WalkerOhio Court of Appeals · 1974
- Noble v. NobleOhio Supreme Court · 1979
3Cited by8 opinions
- Howard v. Catholic Social Services of Cuyahoga County, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
- In Re GentryOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
- In Re Catholic Charitable Bureau of the Archdiocese of Boston, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
- Howard v. Catholic Social Serv. of Cuyahoga Cty., Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
- In Re HigbyOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.