Legal Opinion

Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance v. Kelly

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 19, 2004No. 3-03-0882PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Slater

The plaintiff, Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance Company (Prudential), issued an automobile insurance policy to the defendants, Patricia and Edward Kelly (the Kellys). The policy provided underinsured-motorist (UIM) coverage for four vehicles. After Patricia Kelly suffered injuries in an accident, the Kellys claimed that the policy allowed them to aggregate or “stack” the UIM coverage for the four vehicles. Prudential filed a complaint for declaratory judgment, seeking a finding that the policy did not permit stacking of the coverage. The trial court granted Prudential’s motion for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Crum & Forster Managers Corp. v. Resolution Trust Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1993
  2. American States Insurance v. KolomsIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Bruder v. Country Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Striplin v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  5. Hall v. General Cas. Co. of IllinoisAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Progressive Premier Insurance v. CannonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
  2. Hanson v. Lumley Trucking, LLCAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  3. Bohner v. Ace American InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  4. Bohner v. Ace American InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  5. Bohner v. Ace American Insurance Co. Corrected opinion posted 11/03/05Appellate Court of Illinois · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API