Upchurch v. Goodroe
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
FOSTER, Justice.
This suit is in equity to obtain -the benefits of an agreement for the lease with an option to purchase a textile mill with plant and machinery in Tuscaloosa County, owned by Rosenau.
Complainants, whom we will call Up-church, claim that Goodroe, in whose name the lease and option was made with Rosenau, was acting as their agent for them as an undisclosed principal, and they seek to follow it into the possession of a corporation by the name of Cottondale Mills, Inc., to which it was assigned by Goodroe, and that it be vested in them and out of the corporation. The contract was…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Frenkel v. HudsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
- Van Antwerp v. Van AntwerpSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
- Davis v. Las Ovas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Butts v. CooperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
- Hall & Brown Woodworking Machine Co. v. Haley Furniture & Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1911
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- McMillan, Ltd. v. WARRIOR DRILLING & ENG.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987
- McKinstry v. ThomasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
- Ideal Structures Corp. v. Levine Huntsville Development Corp.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1966
- Shirley v. McNealSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962
- Smith v. HartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.