Kandis v. Pusch

Nichols, J. —

The error assigned that we need to consider is the ruling of the court in sustaining the separate and several demurrers of appellees to the re-amended second paragraph of complaint. It is averred in this pleading, in substance, and so far as here involved, that appellants Kandis and Koutoulas were partners engaged in the restaurant business in the city of LaPorte. Appellee Pusch and Maud V. Pusch, who is not a party to this action, were owners of certain real estate in the city of LaPorte, Indiana, and the other appellees were owners and operators of a restaurant in said city. On…