People v. Van Dorsten
Michigan Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The Court of Appeals reversed the defendant’s first-degree criminal sexual conduct conviction because the jury was not instructed that in order to convict it must unanimously agree on a specific criminal act. There was no request for such an instruction, nor was there an objection to the instructions given. We conclude that, in the circumstances of this case, there was no manifest injustice in failing to give such an instruction, and we remand the case to the circuit court for further proceedings in accordance with the remainder of the Court of Appeals opinion.
i
On the evening of August 9,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Henderson v. KibbeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Schad v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- People v. TownesMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
- People v. KellyMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
- People v. WoodsMichigan Supreme Court · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- State v. ArceoHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
- People v. KellyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
- People v. UllahMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
- People v. HaywoodMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
- Cook v. StegallDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1999
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.