Legal Opinion

Advanced Technology Corp. v. Instron, Inc.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided December 18, 2014No. Civil Action No. 1:12-cv-10171-WGYPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

YOUNG, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Advanced Technology Corporation, Inc. (“ATC”) brings this suit against Instron, Inc. (“Instron”) claiming commercial disparagement. Essentially, ATC alleges that Instron published a magazine article that readers could infer was about ATC’s technology. ATC claims that this inference reflected negatively on its products and caused it to lose client sales. Instron now moves for summary judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. Because ATC has failed to provide sufficient evidence of special damages, the Court GRANTS the motion.

A.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Pineda v. ToomeyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Conformis, Inc. v. Aetna, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2023
  2. Conformis, Inc. v. Aetna Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2021
  3. United States v. Honeywell International, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API