Legal Opinion
White v. Moriarty
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 14, 1993No. A055618PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DOSSEE, J.
Michael James Moriarty appeals from a judgment against him on a promissory note, arguing that the judgment is not supported by substantial evidence. Plaintiff Peter K. White, as trustee for his wife and Mr. and Mrs. John Fall, cross-appeals, arguing statute of limitations issues. We determine that the trial court applied the wrong statute of limitations and remand for recalculation of the amount due. In all other respects, we affirm.
Factual and Procedural Background
In 1983 Moriarty, a California attorney, purchased $10,000 worth of stock in Nisus Video, Inc. Charles Anderson,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. John W. NewhartCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
- Rakestraw v. RodriguesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. HowseDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1990
- Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. BirdDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Jackson v. ThweattTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- United States v. Ruth G. Thornburg Michael D. Thornburg David Jean Thornburg Kathy Ann NorthingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Tivoli Ventures, Inc. v. BumannSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- Investment Co. of the Southwest v. ReeseNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- WAMCO, III, Ltd. v. First Piedmont Mortgage Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1994
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.