Legal Opinion

Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. v. Marietta Oil Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 23, 1939No. 8790PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.

The suit was for an injunction to prevent entry upon, to drill for oil on, the railroad right of way.

The claim was (1) that defendant had no right of any kind to the land, and therefore none to prospect for oil or other minerals underlying it, and (2) that if it did have, such rights were held subject to the exclusive right of plaintiff to possess the right of way for railroad purposes.

The defense was (1) that defendant was the owner of the land and minerals, subject only to plaintiff’s right of way easement, and (2) that the use defendant desired to make of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Right of Way Oil Co. v. Gladys City Oil, Gas & Manufacturing Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Gladys City Oil, Gas & Manufacturing Co. v. Right of Way Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  3. Shell Petroleum Corporation v. WardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939
  4. Midland Valley R. Co. v. SutterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
  5. Olive, Sternenberg & Co. v. Sabine & East Texas Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1895

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Rock Island, A. & L. R. Co. v. GuillorySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1943
  2. Melton v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
  3. Stroud v. Hunt Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  4. The Texas Co. v. Newton Naval S. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Rock Island, A. & L. R. Co. v. GuillorySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1943

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API