National Electric Products Corp. v. Circle Flexible Conduit Co.
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MO'SCOWITZ, District Judge.
This is a motion made by the plaintiff for an order striking from the answer of the defendant the last sentence in paragraph 11, and the entire counterclaim in paragraphs 2 and 3 of defendant’s prayer.
The action was brought for the alleged in fringement of letters patent of the United States No. 1,687,013 for armored electric cable and No. 1,801,549 for anti-short hushing.
In paragraph 11 of the defendant’s answer defendant denies the validity of the patent and infringement, and sets up as a defense that it was licensed by the plaintiff. In the last sentence of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Fleitmann Ex Rel. Stockholders of the Consolidated Street Lighting Co. v. Welsbach Street Lighting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- United States Fire Escape Counterbalance Co. v. Joseph Halsted Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1912
- Motion Picture Patents Co. v. UllmanU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1910
- Motion Picture Patents Co. v. LaemmleU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1910
3Cited by2 opinions
- Trebuhs Realty Co. v. News Syndicate Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1952
- Aeration Processes, Inc. v. Walter Kidde & Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1947