Legal Opinion

National Electric Products Corp. v. Circle Flexible Conduit Co.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided September 30, 1931No. 5551PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MO'SCOWITZ, District Judge.

This is a motion made by the plaintiff for an order striking from the answer of the defendant the last sentence in paragraph 11, and the entire counterclaim in paragraphs 2 and 3 of defendant’s prayer.

The action was brought for the alleged in fringement of letters patent of the United States No. 1,687,013 for armored electric cable and No. 1,801,549 for anti-short hushing.

In paragraph 11 of the defendant’s answer defendant denies the validity of the patent and infringement, and sets up as a defense that it was licensed by the plaintiff. In the last sentence of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fleitmann Ex Rel. Stockholders of the Consolidated Street Lighting Co. v. Welsbach Street Lighting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. United States Fire Escape Counterbalance Co. v. Joseph Halsted Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1912
  3. Motion Picture Patents Co. v. UllmanU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1910
  4. Motion Picture Patents Co. v. LaemmleU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1910

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Trebuhs Realty Co. v. News Syndicate Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1952
  2. Aeration Processes, Inc. v. Walter Kidde & Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API