Legal Opinion

Mason v. World War II Service Compensation Board

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 5, 1952No. 47989PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGarfield, J.

The important question presented here is whether on appeal to the district court from the disapproval by the World War II Service Compensation Board of an application for compensation tbe court must permit evidence to be introduced or must, as the board contends, consider only the transcript filed, by the board. The trial court held evidence aside from the transcript could be offered and considered. We affirm this decision. ■■ .....

' Defendant board disapproved plaintiff’s application for compensation on the ground he was not a legal resident of Iowa at the time he entered active service in…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Lone Star Gas Co. v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Kuiken v. GarrettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1952
  3. Collier & Wallis, Ltd. v. AstorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Glatstein v. GrundSupreme Court of Iowa · 1952
  5. State v. SavreSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Buda v. FultonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
  2. Sieg v. CIV. SERV. COM'N OF WEST DES MOINESSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
  3. In Re the Marriage of HustonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
  4. In The Matter Of S.p., Alleged To Be A Chronic Substance Abuser, S.p.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2006
  5. Staley v. Fazel Bros. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1956

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API