Legal Opinion

Schleiss v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1976No. State 206 (1974)PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnor T. Hansen, J.

We set forth only those facts relevant to this review, some at this time and others in considering the issues raised by the defendant.

A second alleged party to the crime, Ronald Mathwick, was tried in a separate proceeding, which took place prior to defendant’s trial. Mathwick was adjudged not guilty. The defendant moved the court for dismissal on the ground that the issue to be tried had been fully litigated in the case of State v. Mathwick and, thus, the state was foreclosed from relitigation of the alleged criminal violation with respect to defendant. This motion was denied.

In both the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. People v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Champlain v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  5. State v. MillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Manson v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State v. PetroneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Johnson v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  5. State v. WilliamsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API