Legal Opinion

Government Employees Insurance v. Smith

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 8, 2005No. 1—03—2438Published

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Garcia

On February 18, 2002, the plaintiff, Government Employees Insurance Company (GEICO), filed a subrogation action against the defendant, David Smith, for property damage related to a traffic accident with Rosalyn Walton, GEICO’s subroger.

On August 19, 2002, a mandatory arbitration hearing took place and the arbitrators entered an award in favor of GEICO. However, the arbitrators’ order noted “bad faith participation by [GEICO] in that [GEICO] failed to produce, pursuant to [a] Rule 237 Notice To Produce [166 Ill. 2d R. 237(b)] ‘GEICO estimator John Ciullo’ as to the issue of amount of damages.”

B…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. JosephAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
  2. State Farm Insurance v. HarmonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  3. Smith v. GleashAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  4. State Farm Insurance v. JacquezAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  5. Anderson v. MercyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API