State v. M.J.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
FRANK, Acting Chief Judge.
The state appeals from the trial court’s order granting M.J.’s motion to suppress. The motion was grounded upon a contention that M.J.’s consent to a search was neither voluntary nor based upon probable cause. We reverse.
In unrefuted testimony, Officer Spearden D. Lefkimiotis of the St. Petersburg Police Department described th'e events that occurred at 1:00 a.m. on January 18,1995, at an apartment building known for drug trade. Because the building was clearly posted with “No Trespassing” and “No Loitering” signs, the officer’s attention was drawn to a group of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Minnesota v. DickersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- State v. WilsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- State v. JenkinsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- State v. ZebrickSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
3Cited by3 opinions
- D.G. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- Conyers v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
- DG v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998