Legal Opinion

State v. M.J.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 26, 1996No. 95-02033PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANK, Acting Chief Judge.

The state appeals from the trial court’s order granting M.J.’s motion to suppress. The motion was grounded upon a contention that M.J.’s consent to a search was neither voluntary nor based upon probable cause. We reverse.

In unrefuted testimony, Officer Spearden D. Lefkimiotis of the St. Petersburg Police Department described th'e events that occurred at 1:00 a.m. on January 18,1995, at an apartment building known for drug trade. Because the building was clearly posted with “No Trespassing” and “No Loitering” signs, the officer’s attention was drawn to a group of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Minnesota v. DickersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. State v. WilsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  3. State v. JenkinsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  4. State v. ZebrickSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. D.G. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  2. Conyers v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  3. DG v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API