Legal Opinion

People v. Placek

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 26, 1997No. 1-95-4398PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Theis

A jury found defendant James Placek guilty of delivery of a controlled substance. This was the second time defendant was tried on that charge. Initially, defendant was tried and convicted of delivery of a controlled substance, possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver, and theft. However, the trial court granted defendant’s motion for a new trial because defendant demonstrated that the Illinois Supreme Court found the theft charges upon which he was tried unconstitutional in People v. Zaremba, 158 Ill. 2d 36, 630 N.E.2d 797 (1994).

Prior to his second trial, defendant argued…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. EnochIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  2. People v. KimbroughAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  3. People v. RobinsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  4. People v. ZarembaIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
  5. People v. CrossIllinois Supreme Court · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. PlacekIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Rodgers v. Peoples Gas Light & Coke Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2000
  3. People v. PlacekIllinois Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API