Legal Opinion
People v. Haynes
Criminal Court of the City of New York
Decided January 31, 1985PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Stanley Gartenstein, J.
Defendant, who was previously “convicted” in the Family Court of New York County on the very same charges he now faces in this court, moves to dismiss the information herein on double jeopardy grounds The within prosecution was commenced upon rearrest when, during a predispositional investigation following “conviction” in the Family Court (viz., fact finding within the meaning of Family Ct Act § 301.2 [6]), it was learned that he was over that court’s jurisdictional age of 16 at the time the acts in question were allegedly committed.
The double…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- People Ex Rel. Meyer v. WardenNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- People v. PaquetteNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
- In re Donald F.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- People v. ShawNew York Justice Court · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Commonwealth v. A JuvenileMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1989
- In re Anne-Marie P.New York City Family Court · 1986