Legal Opinion

People v. Shaw

New York Justice Court

Decided December 5, 1962PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harold E. Moore, Jr., J.

Defendant moves to dismiss the information herein for legal insufficiency. The information alleges that defendant took certain heifers with the intent to deprive the owner of their use. The information fails to state who the owner of the cattle is or under what circumstances they were taken.

In order to find this information insufficient in form, the court must determine that the allegations contained therein do not adequately inform the defendant of the nature of the charge against him, and the acts constituting the crime. (People v. Pullman, 3 Misc 2d 188; People v.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. GroganNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  2. People v. ZambounisNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  3. People Ex Rel. Meyer v. WardenNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  4. People v. BertramNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
  5. People v. Patrick, New York County Courts1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. CrisofulliCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1977
  2. People v. HaynesCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1985
  3. State v. AndrusSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1967
  4. State v. AndrusSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API