Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Armour Service of Oklahoma, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided March 16, 1964No. Civ. No. 64-10Published

1Opinion of the Court

DAUGHERTY, District Judge.

Upon consideration of the Motion to Dismiss of the defendants and the response of plaintiff thereto and the briefs filed in support of and in opposition to said motion, the Court finds that said Motion to Dismiss should be sustained and this action should be dismissed due to a lack of jurisdiction in this court, inasmuch as there does not exist the required diversity of citizenship between the parties plaintiff and defendant.

The pleadings before the Court establish that the plaintiff is a citizen of Oklahoma, the defendant Earl White is a citizen of Oklahoma, the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fox v. MacKayU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1894
  2. McGrier v. P. Ballantine & SonsDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API