Legal Opinion

Cook v. Clinkenbeard

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 25, 1974No. 46410PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IRWIN, Justice.

Petitioner [claimant], .seeks review of an order denying his claim for compensation for the stated reason he failed to give “either statutory written notice or actual notice” within 30 days of the alleged injury.

Claim for compensation was filed November 12, 1971, alleging accidental injury on August 26, 1971, while working as a machinist for respondent in covered employment. On December 10, 1971, respondent filed answer denying occurrence of accidental injury or resulting disability. The case was heard April 4, 1972, on the issue of claimant’s entitlement to temporary…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Travelers Insurance Company v. LeedySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
  2. Crutchfield v. BogleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  3. Dye v. Ed Johnston Grain CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
  4. Wood v. Oklahoma Osteopathic HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
  5. Drennan v. WarburtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. AMF Tubescope Company v. HatchelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  2. Prough v. Edinger, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  3. Tucker v. ADG, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
  4. Beyale v. Arizona Public Service Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Roth v. Mercy Health Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API