Legal Opinion
Iacobucci v. Pinell
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
Decided August 23, 1967No. 29095; No. 29095PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMurphy, J.
This is an action of tort for personal injuries, property damage and consequential damages as a result of a two-car collision on the South-East Expressway.
It was agreed at the trial that the street was a public way, that both operators were duly licensed, that both cars were properly registered, and that the accident occurred at 10:30 p.m. on the day in question.
The defendant’s answer was a general denial, contributory negligence, lack of agency, statute of limitations and illegal registration.
The evidence was conflicting. There was evidence from the plaintiffs that after their vehicle had…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Moss v. Old Colony Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
- Kennedy Bros. v. BirdMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- DeLuca v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- Nicoli v. BerglundMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Zaleski v. ZaleskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Fontaine v. HunterMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1994
- Baker v. TokarzMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1984
- Davis v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1995
- Kennedy v. McGrathMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1993
- Bateman & Slade, Inc. v. CostelloMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.