Legal Opinion
Carlos Rendon v. Eric Holder, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 2, 2015No. 10-72239PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Dissent by Judge GRABER; Dissent by Judge KOZINSKI.
ORDER
The panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing.
A sua sponte call for a vote on rehearing this case en banc was made by an active judge of this court. The call failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges. Fed. R.App. P. 35. The sua sponte en banc call is rejected.
*467Judge Kozinski’s dissent from denial of rehearing en banc and Judge Graber’s dissent from denial of rehearing en banc are filed concurrently with this Order.
2DissentGraber, Circuit Judge, joined by O’Scannlain, Gould, Tallman, Bybee, Callahan, Bea, and Ikuta, Circuit Judges,
I respectfully but emphatically dissent from the denial of rehearing en banc.…
3Cases cited40 opinions
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Rodriguez De Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Agostini v. FeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by38 opinions
- Mathis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- United States v. FaustCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Christopher RitcheyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- Gonzalo Dominguez v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Ramon Duran Guillen v. U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.