Legal Opinion

Clause Printing Press Co. v. Chicago Trust & Savings Bank

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 1897No. 18,259PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From the Elkhart Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcCabe, C. J.

The appellee filed an application or motion to correct the record of a judgment in favor of the appellee by making a nune pro tunc entry. The entry and correction sought were made. It is assigned for error that the trial court erred in overruling appellant’s motion to strike out plaintiff’s complaint, as it is called in the assignment of errors, but it is not a complaint; it is a mere motion. Latta, v. Griffith, 57 Ind. 329; Urbanski v. Manns, 87 Ind. 585. And that said court erred in overruling appellant’s motion for a new trial. There is no error in refusing to entertain a motion to strike…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Blemel v. ShattuckIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Latta v. GriffithIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Runnels v. KaylorIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Conway v. DayIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Scotten v. DivilbissIndiana Supreme Court · 1877

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. LAXTONIndiana Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Citizens Trust Co., Rec. v. Wheeling Can Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Morrow v. GeetingIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API