Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Decious
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided June 7, 1985No. 85 C 1654PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
NICKERSON, District Judge.
Movants seek an order quashing the warrants executed upon them on or about February 17, 1984 within the Eastern District of New York and directing the return of all property seized thereunder pursuant to to Rule 41(e) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. The government represents that it intends to return voluntarily all the property seized from this district and that the motion is moot.
Rule 41(e) provides that a “person aggrieved by an unlawful search and seizure may move the district court for the district in which the property was seized…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re Grand Jury Proceedings Involving Berkley & Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1979
- United States v. LesterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
- In re HerrDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1979
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re Grand Jury ProceedingsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- Nick v. AbramsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Application of First United Financial Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1985
- In re Search Warrant Issued July 14, 1987District Court, N.D. Texas · 1988
- Decious, Ex ParteCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985