Legal Opinion

Yancy Douglas Hardy v. United States Board of Parole

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 28, 1971No. 26552_1PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant, under sentences of imprisonment for violations of state and federal law, wants credit on his federal sentence for the time he served in state prison. He bases his contention on the fact that the sentence by the state court was made to run concurrently with the sentence he was then serving.

It is fundamental that appellant’s federal sentence did not begin to run until appellant, a parole violator, was returned to federal prison for the service of the balance of his sentence. 1 Zerbst v. Kidwell, 304 U.S. 359, 58 S.Ct. 872, 82 L.Ed. 1399 (1938); Clark v. Blackwell, 374 F. 2d 952 (5th…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Zerbst v. KidwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. William Warren Hash v. Pat Henderson, United States Marshal for the Eastern District of ArkansasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
  3. John D. Clark, Jr. v. Olin G. Blackwell, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Anthony Del Guzzi v. United States of America U.S. Parole Commission United States Marshal U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  2. Meagher v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
  3. Lionel v. DayDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1976
  4. United States v. Donald C. GrahamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  5. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API