Legal Opinion

Bingham v. Wilson

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided March 11, 2025No. 2:25-cv-00163Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION Natalie Dawn Bingham, et al., Case No. 2:25-cv-163-RMG Plaintiffs, v. ORDER AND OPINION Alan McCrory Wilson, in his official capacity as Attorney General of South Carolina, et al., Defendants. Before the Court is Plaintiff Jane Doe’s motion to proceed under a pseudonym and for a protective order limiting disclosure of her identity to counsel for Defendants and this Court pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c). (Dkt. No. 5). Defendants and Intervenor-Defendant oppose Plaintiff’s motion. (Dkt. Nos. 61, 62). Plaintiff…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Company Doe v. Public CitizenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
  2. John James Mary James v. Cecil B. Jacobson, Jr., M.D. Reproductive Genetics Center, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
  3. Minter v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, D. Maryland · 2009
  4. Doe v. Pittsylvania CountyDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2012
  5. Jane Doe v. Cenk SidarCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API